Is There a Relationship between Anxiety-depression Level and SYNTAX Score in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?

Abstract

Objectives: The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary interventions with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score is a quantitative scoring system used to evaluate the severity and extent of the disease in patients with coronary artery disease. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a scale that measures the anxiety and depression levels of patients. The relationship between psychosocial stress and atherosclerosis is well known. In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between SYNTAX score and HADS in patients who performed percutaneous coronary intervention due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Methods: A total of 130 subjects with ACS were included in our study. The SYNTAX score, which was calculated by two independent interventional cardiologists, was divided into three groups: 0–22, low; 23–32, moderate; 33 and above, high. In our study, patients’ anxiety and depression levels were evaluated with HADS 1 month after ACS.

Results: Of the total subjects, 68, 39, and 23 patients were determined in SYNTAX scores of 0–22, 23–32, and >33 groups, respectively. A significant relationship was observed between the high SYNTAX score and the HADS-depression and anxiety scale (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). In the correlation analysis found that, a moderate positive correlation between the SYNTAX score and depression level, and a weak positive correlation between the SYNTAX and anxiety level (r=0.642, r=0.538, respectively).

Conclusion: In our study, we found that HADS and SYNTAX scores were significantly correlated in ACS patients who performed percutaneous coronary intervention.

Cite This Article: Kaya AF, Yılmaz C, Özdil MH, Soner S, Özbek M. Is There a Relationship between Anxietydepression Level and SYNTAX Score in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Koşuyolu Heart J 2024;27(1):3–8

The study was approved by the Dicle University Faculty of Medicine Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (no: 193, date: 14/06/2023).

Externally peer-reviewed.

Concept – A.F.K., M.H.Ö., C.Y.; Design – A.F.K., M.H.Ö., C.Y.; Supervision – A.F.K., S.S., M.Ö.; Funding – A.F.K., M.H.Ö., C.Y.; Materials – A.F.K.; Data collection and/or processing – A.F.K., S.S., M.Ö.; Data analysis and/or interpretation – A.F.K., M.H.Ö., C.Y.; Literature search – C.Y., A.F.K.; Writing – C.Y., A.F.K.; Critical review – S.S., C.Y., M.H.Ö.

All authors declared no conflict of interest.

The authors declared that they did not use artificial intelligence for writing assistance.

The authors declared that this study received no financial support.